BOOK BUZZ FROM BOOK EXPO AMERICA
by Amy Hess, guest columnist
We all want buzz. To be a part of what everyone is talking about. This is especially important in order to for authors who must be a part of the buzz to sell books. At a Book Expo America/PMA panel I attended yesterday, Sandy Trupp, Managing Director Planned TV Arts (and primary writer of this blog) launched a discussion on the fine art of creating it. Diane Rehm of NPR, Dan Raviv of CBS News and Marie Arana of Washington Post’s Book World were the featured guests who dished on what journalists really want and how to get your message out there in a super saturated world. Diane Rehm who gives significant air time to books is cutting back on the number of authors she has on her show. She says that with everything going on in the world, she just doesn’t feel that it can be justified and instead must talk about news. It’s sad because so many do enjoy author interviews and the break from the news headlines. Many people say they enjoy author interviews in their cars, but at the same time, more and more shows are doing shorter author interviews.
As publicists we advise our authors to find a news hook and tap into that. At the same time though, we have to be careful that we can separate our author’s voice from the masses that flood the media with their opinions on the latest headlines. How much is too much coverage on a topic? When does it become saturated? The panelists agreed that you need to show a new angle on a topic in the news to be covered. It’s very difficult to appear without a news hook although lighter topics that interest the host can be covered. Dan Raviv will occasionally do a story on a biography or historical non-fiction, even if the headlines don’t warrant it. But it’s still rare. Diane Rehm admits that she won’t cover something that she doesn’t find interesting. Marie Arana is partial to international affairs and history, but tries to balance her coverage of those types of books with other subjects to be fair.
And there are guidelines that will get you in the door. As busy as Marie Arana is, she personally reads every email she’s sent. She may not respond, but she prefers an email. She doesn’t like to hear from authors themselves, only publicists. Diane Rehm’s staff doesn’t work with publicists very often. You have to mail Diane’s producer a book. And no self-published books. In order to compete with the 150 books a week she receives, make it as easy on the producer as possible.
All of the journalists want the information they need at their finger tips in an easy to read, short, and smart format. Dan Raviv likes to have a biography but finds Question and Answer sheets a waste, wanting to come up with his own questions. Diane likes them because it may point her to an angle she hasn’t thought of before.
All agreed that they are cynical of blurbs which they feel are now manufactured and mean nothing. Same with endorsements. And backlist books aren’t likely to be covered. However, positioning the person with a backlist book as an expert on a topic in today’s news could work.
When you do get a hit, it may go further than you realize these days. Podcasts, streaming video and audio, and online radio often use coverage from other venues so your message goes further. This can be hit or miss. Getting covered on a blog though doesn’t seem to do much good-yet. Journalists follow the track record of bloggers carefully and unless the source is very reliable, they just can’t trust it.
They all agreed that books that are well-written and meaningful should have a chance in this sometimes celebrity-driven news world.

11 Comments:
Diane Rehm should retire. She had a hot show years ago, interesting, with a variety of guests - sometimes provactive, always enlightening, but not so any longer. Going from one radio station to the next, the most interesting thing you hear is on WTOP when they do some :30 feature. The so-called 'news' of the day is so over-manufactured there is no refreshing take on it because everyone's done 'it' ad nauseum. It would be a remarkable accomplishment for some of these folks to take a departure from the what they 'think' is news, but they are too busy listening to each other and regurgitating it all over again with different call letters.
As a rising tide lifts all boats, so a really good book gets the buzz. All you have to do is cut through the noise to find what's good. No easy task. And if you can't find a truly good book (one that's uplifting and shows us hidden truth} then surely we all love a good smarmy confession from some Brittany-like celebrity. Then there's the great fraud, i.e., A MILLION LITTLE PIECES. Readers enjoy a good fraud; it takes them out of their mundane existence, like a circus or a freak show. There's the MUST READ: The Da Vinci Code. Love it or be bored silly by it, it doesn't matter. It's what we're SUPPOSED to be talking about (even if we don't actually read it). Should we elect not to follow the current buzz, whatever it may be, then we're castaways. Dolts. There are great exposes and commentaries out there, thoughtful scholarship (THE DEATH OF POLITICS), yet for the past five years we've displayed an unusual love of all things anti-intellectual. Ideas belong in the wood-chipper. Thus buzz blinks off when the brain is challenged to go to work. Books and newspapers and all print media are vanishing. I suppose it's Darwinian evolution, which makes sense unless you're the type that just can't get enough of THE RAPTURE. After all, God is still makes good reading so long as He's we're paying Him.
Soon newspapers will morph into digital blogs--DELETE, DELETE...Please just go away, you fact-checking news hounds and truth-tellers. Bring on the clowns of opinion. Hello Fox News!
Could it be that we really don't want good books any longer? If Hemingway rose up from the dead would anyone bother to read him?
In the end, creeping illiteracy is kind of soothing. Like Communism and Smith and Wesson, it's the great American equalizer.
Diane Rehm is one of the great broadcasters. She has inspired people to read. And she has started national dialogues. She is an amazing personality.
There are so many good books and topics out there that we really DO need more than 30 seconds of time to learn and discuss.
America is faced with a growing problem of un-literacy; people simply not reading books. With radio, TV, magazines and newspapers giving less and less coverage to authors and books, they feed the spiraling downtrend of un-literacy. The dumbing down of America will continue unabated unless media outlets help generate more interest in books and authors. Along with freedom of the press comes a responsibility to the nation. Wonderful broadcasters like Diane Rehm should be doing more, not fewer, author interviews.
I love to read. I don't care about buzz.Everything is so commercial now that I don't know who to believe.I do believe my frineds when they tell me about a good book. My book club is the best.I trust my friends.
About Diane Rehm. She is the most trust-worthy person on radio.If she quits, I'll stop listening to radio altogether.Who else is there?
God Bless the last poster. If you think Diane Rehm is the only thing on radio worth listening to, then you don't listen to much radio. She was a wonderful interviewer, but she has lost her lustre and should probably say: goodnight, Gracie.
Does everything have to be about politics, Poster No. 2? We are a society of 'illiterati' that's for certain. With the rise in popularity of the Jessica Simpson's of the world, I fear our younger generations are void of any patience for deep thought or introspection and certainly none left over to read. But to politicize it? One could certainly argue that some school systems, no matter how much funding they receive, still manage to mistake fancy computers, tricked-out gymnasiums and other amenities for actual learning. With parents buying every gadget imaginable for their kids from ipods and gameboys, and yet still other children worried about which designer sneakers they can steal from their neighbor's locker, every one is too busy to read. They are too overstimulated and consumed with the non-essentials in life. Yet somehow a news organization like Fox News is responsible for that, too. You bet it takes a village, It takes a village to plow through all the debris we are knee deep in to get to the truth about why some people don't read anymore. We need to get back to basics.
And why does everything have to be so hot? Whst is wrong with being bored? It's good for the soul every now and then.
I think our society is getting too impatient to read.And it's awkward to hold a book, but there is nothing like getting into a good book and loving it.
Seems Poster #2 isn't saying it's all politics, but rather that politics and the atmosphere it creates in no small way shapes our culture and our reading habits. It's ironic. There were 183,000 titles displayed at BEA and, at the same time, we have a President who is a proud non-reader: "criminally incurious" is the term often used to describe him. Ask any librarian about politics and how it impacts reading. Ask educators struggling to infuse more than rote test-taking into the minds of students. Yes, there are other powerful factors at work which dim the reading habit, but it would be short-sighted to discount the influence of leadership on the national psyche. Compare the era of JFK and the present literary Dark Age and you'll find a stark and troubling contrast.
When was the last time a poet appeared at the White House? A Nobel winner? A great musician? A philosopher? It isn't up to political leadership to shape culture entirely, but it sure has a role in helping to define what is of value to our society.
Yes, I'm sure that the "criminally incurious" occupant at the White House is so illiterate that a librarian, of all occupations, would marry him. Good grief. The un-reading of America began at least two generations ago and every President and First Lady over the last 20 years, at least, including the present one, has had book readings at The White House and went on the road to read out loud to children in schools. If only we could ship our kids to The White House every day instead of us reading to them at night. The most refreshing thing I heard all weekend was a neighbor calling into his wife: Those kids aren't watching television are they?!
Post a Comment
<< Home